Tuesday, 14 May 2013

A Nightmare on Elm Street


A nightmare on Elm Street

I am going to write about the film A nightmare on Elm Street.

What is the film about?

The original film is set in the 1980’s, a psychopath who goes by the name of Freddy Krueger (also known as the Springwood Slasher) murdered several children using a glove with razor blades attached to each finger. Nancy Thompson is the daughter of the police officer who arrested Krueger. Krueger is on the warpath and wants revenge on Nancy and her friends so he starts stalking them in terrifying nightmares. When Nancy’s friends start dying in their dreams after confrontations with Krueger, Nancy realises she has to find a way to stop Krueger.

 
 
 
 
 
What are the differences?

There are lots of differences between the original (1984) and the remake (2010)

Names

The names in the remake have been changed, Nancy Thompson (1984) is Nancy Holbrook in the remake, Rod Lane (1984) is Jesse Braun in the remake, Glen Lantz (1984) is Jesse Braun in the remake, Nancy’s mother Marge Thompson (1984) is now Gwen Holbrook and Tina Grey (1984) is now Kristen Fowles.

I think the names have been changed because it brings something new and fresh to the film and the names have been much more modernised because it was remade in 2010 and popular names have changed a lot since 1984.

Storyline

. In the original film Krueger is a child murderer but in the remake he is a convicted child molester.

. The 2010 remake features a blogging nightmare to capture modern day technology.

.In the 1984 version you see Nancy’s mother die twice, once when she burns in her bed and when she gets pulled through the front door of her house but in the remake she gets stabbed through her eye sockets and pulled into the mirror behind her.

. In the remake Kris Fowles (Tina in the original) dreams about Freddy killing her dog Rufus and supposedly awakes from her dream only to find Freddy lying beside her instead of Freddy chasing her from her house into some bin bags which turns into her bed.

. The scene where Nancy gets pulled through the water hole in the bath tub has been replaced with Freddy’s glove appearing and then leaving upon hearing Nancy’s mother’s voice.

I also think these changes have been made to make it more fresh and so they can use more special effects than the original and for example the scene with the blogging nightmare wouldn’t have existed and these days there are lots of bloggers, especially younger people so the audience would be able to relate with this part of the storyline.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Similarities

There are also some similarities

. In the scene where Nancy is in the bath Freddy’s hand goes to grab her, even though the scene ends differently most of it is exactly the same.

. In the scene in the school corridor both Nancy’s see their best friend in the same clear body bag.

. The scene where you see Krueger coming through the wall are exactly the same.

. Also the scene in which Nancy (1984) freaks out in the classroom after falling asleep, the character of Kristen (2010) also freaks out in the classroom, even though it’s different characters it’s the same scenario.

. The scene where Tina (Kristen in the 2010) gets killed is pretty much the same in the way she gets dragged up into the air and slashed on her chest.

 

Are remakes good or bad?

Personally I don’t like remakes; some can be good depending if it needs to be refreshed but there is just some films that shouldn’t be touched, for instance this film. The original I feel is much better because in the remake the CGI I feel makes it look stupid and I feel no imagination was used when they had the opportunity to be a bit more imaginative.

Here are some reviews on the remake.

1.      The real problem with A Nightmare on Elm Street 2010 is: it's really unbelievably dull. – Ali Catterall from Film4

2.      Traffics in overly familiar scare tactics, setting up predictable false alarms and telegraphing in advance just when Freddy will pop into the frame and utter one of his labored witticisms.- A.O Scott from the New York Times.

3.      Many people have already made the mistake of holding this film up to the original, expecting it to be just as good, but it just isn't. However, taken on its own, it's still an entertaining horror film and an interesting take on the material. – Jeff Beck from Examiner.com

4.      This is the worst yet from Michael Bay's horror production company Platinum Dunes, which also brought you rubbish re-makes of Halloween and Friday the 13th. – Nigel Floyd from Time Out.

5.       Does it matter that the plot is little more than a cynical, machine-tooled retread of the 1984 original? Debut director Samuel Bayer was not hired to dismantle the franchise but to shoot it afresh. – Xan Brooks from the Guardian (UK)

The reason why I think people have made these comments is because maybe it was too big of a film to try and remake, everybody knows this film and when the remake came out people may have expected too much from the storyline and the director. But the positive comments are basically saying that against the remake it isn’t as good but if you throw the original out the window and concentrate on the remake it stands just as well as any other horror film and its still enjoyable.

 
Why do people remake films?

Many people ask why remake perfectly good films? Well in my opinion there’s one main purpose, money. If an old film has done well in the past chances are it’s going to be made again simply because the film will already have an audience and many of them will in fact go to see the remake.

Here is some statistics for A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

Budget

$1,800,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend

$1,271,000 (USA) (11 November 1984) (165 Screens)

As you can see it didn’t do that well in the opening weekend but that doesn’t mean there’s no hope, in fact it actually made $25, 504,513. Not bad at all, from that moment on wards it was known as a classic so it was typically going to be a choice for a remake.

There is lots of technology used in modern day films and this remake is no exception, when you watch the original and then the remake back to back you see the difference in quality almost as if it’s been digitally re mastered. CGI has been used in the remake but I think it’s been used too much and they should have used more of the techniques that were used in the original.

The reason I believe there is much more CGI used in this film is because modern day blockbusters use a hell of a lot of special effects and this film is basically trying to make as much money as possible so uses modern day technology to be known as a blockbuster film and make a huge profit.

Here is some statistics for A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)


Budget

$35,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend

$32,902,299 (USA) (2 May 2010) (3,332 Screens)
£1,342,837 (UK) (
9 May 2010) (354 Screens)

As you can see the opening weekend didn’t do well either, this seems like a pattern is occurring because overall it made $113,400,000 (Worldwide) (8 August 2010)

Marketing

The original A Nightmare on Elm Street has a large franchise which includes a series produced by New Line Cinema; there are comic books and a novel so there was a whole load of money to be made off the back of the film.

In 2010 after the remake came out the National Entertainment Collectibles Association released two new action figures of Freddy, they also released a replica of Freddy’s clawed glove. Also a game was released in which a young girl had to keep herself awake using coffee, self-mutilation, cold showers and other means to stay awake to keep her safe from Freddy.

 


Bibliography


Photo 2- www.fanpop.com

Photo 3- www.listal.com

Photo 4- www.fanpop.com


Statistics for A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)- http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0087800/business?ref_=tt_dt_bus

Statistics for A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)- http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt1179056/business?ref_=tt_dt_bus

No comments:

Post a Comment